A paper presented at the 2015 Nigerian Bar Association Annual General Conference at the International Conference Centre, Abuja on the 25th of August, 2015.
Introduction
The use and abuse of substances of natural origin has been known for ages. For centuries man has tried to escape from the unpleasant features of life, whether real or imaginary, by using fermented liquors or plant products. On the basis of archaeological evidence, it would appear that alcohol for example has been in use since the prehistoric times. In other words, no one knows the exact date of the discovery of alcohol, but many writers indicate that alcohol has been in use around 6400 B.C. The first written report of tobacco smoking was in the fifteenth century where Christopher Columbus indicated in his log book of October 12, 1492 that the natives of San Salvador gave him tobacco leaves. Similarly, 2737 B.C. is cited as earliest reference to Marijuana (Cannabis) by Emperor Shen Nung. Also, opium and its derivatives have a history of their medicinal use dating back almost six thousand years. Opium is a unique compound taken from the juice of the poppy plant (Papaver Somniferum). Cocaine which is the main alkaloid of the coca leaf was first synthesized in the 1850’s. What therefore has changed? What has changed is the new trend, age of onset (which reports have put at 8 years), indiscriminate use, predisposing and precipitating factors, pattern of use, new discoveries and spiral consequences. 2 Today, substance abuse is one of the most significant medical, psychological, social and economic problems facing mankind. More worrisome is the fact that substance abuse is no longer isolated within professional groups, cultural groups and geographical region but has permeated various national and continental boundaries. Substance/drug abuse related problems therefore, affect practically all nations, all classes of the society, people in all walks of life, types of jobs and all ages. Society pays a heavy toll for substance/drug abuse both in economic as well as in human endeavours.
Classification of Substances of Abuse
Different substances have different pharmacological compositions as well as effects on the users. This has caused misclassifications of substances of abuse. For the purpose of this presentation, substances of abuse shall be grouped thus:
- Stimulants
- Depressants
- Non-Conventional Drugs
- Anabolic Steroids
- Licit and Illicit Substances
- Licit Drugs
- Illicit Drugs/Substances
- Peer pressure
- Curiosity
- Drug Subculture
- Personality
- Ignorance
- Depression
- Nature of job
- Mental health disorder
- Risk Factors Factors that predispose an individual to develop stress are called risk factors. This vulnerability could be due to genetic or some environmental influences. In other words, the person who carries such vulnerability has greater chances of developing stress-related disorders than others.
- Personality trait
- Poor defence mechanism
- Pre-existing mental disorder
- Genetic predisposition
- Certain medical disorders 6
- Early childhood trauma
- Beliefs
- Aggravating Factors
- Occupation
- Inadequate rest
- Overambitious target/high expectations
- Hostile environment
- Conflicts (marital, financial etc)
- Poor social network
- Relaxation response: Breathing, Progressive muscle relaxation
- Meditation
- Exercise
- Diet
- Time management
- Goal setting
- Problem solving skills
- Assertiveness skills
- Cognitive techniques
- Stress management course.
- Absenteeism: Substance abuse employees absent themselves from work on an average of three times more often than non-drug-using employees. Reasons for absenteeism are usually for vague ailments, implausible reasons or hangover. While at work, they are more absent at duty post than non drug using employees. In addition, their activities are associated with tardiness.
- Accident: Substance abuse employees are three to four times more likely to be involved in an on-the-job accident, injuring themselves and co-employees. Operating machinery under the influence of drugs for example is clearly a high-risk. According 9 to United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration publication, 65% of workplace accidents are caused by substance abuse.
- Low Productivity: Low productivity by substance abuse employees arise from a number of interrelated factors such as poor health condition, family problems, problems with law enforcement, hangover, emotional instability, loss of job advancement, and impaired judgment. Low productivity also arises from missed deadlines, errors due to inattention, lowered job efficiency, and spasmodic work pace.
- Shared Burden: Substance abuse employees put a potentially heavy burden on colleagues and employers due to frequent accident, working at minimal capacity, increase in the workloads of others, lower productivity, compromise product quality, and tarnish company’s image. They reduce competitiveness and profitability thereby weakening the companies and threatening everyone’s job security.
- Violence and Destruction: Substance abuse employees are likely to engage in a fight because of their high level of intolerance and engage in destructive activities in the workplace.
- Workplace Prostitution: This is mostly applicable to female substance abuse employees. Due to their insatiable drug craving, they are prone to financial difficulties. This makes them borrow money from their colleagues and in most cases they are not able to pay back in cash. In the same way, their frequent breach of organizational rules and regulations exposes them to their male bosses who take advantage of them.
- Financial mismanagement: It is very common for substance abuse employees to divert company money entrusted unto them due to their high craving for drugs.
- Loss: Loss from drug abuse employees arise from outright theft/diversion of company’s resources, loss from low productivity, damage and poor equipment handling, management and carelessnes.
- Education, Training and Development: Substance abuse affects cognition, perception, attention and retentive memory. Drug abuse, therefore impedes staff training to cope with present job and development for future task. Drug dependent employees find it difficult to benefit from the task of training and development.
- Employee Turnover: Where cases of substance abuse employees in the workplace are not well managed, it leads to loss of job. Studies show that it costs a business an average of $7,000 (about #1,575,000.00) to replace a salaried worker.
- Written Policy: Documentation of drug use policy is a very important tool for substance abuse prevention and management in the workplace. This should be supported by top management, understood by employees and well publicized.
- Employee drug education: There should be a regular drug abuse preventive education programme for employees that will focus not only on the consequences of drug abuse but also on coping skills and the availability of help for users.
- Drug abuse testing: This is the introduction of appropriate drug use testing facility, designed to prevent and identify employees who use illicit drugs and as part of a comprehensive programme for recruitment. This should be done in line with organizational drug policy without infringing on employees fundamental human rights and breach of labour laws.
- Identify enabling factors: There are a number of enabling factors that encourage substance use in the workplace. One of these factors is availability of these substances in our organizations’ neighbourhood. Unfortunately most organizations don’t bother about what happens in their neighbourhood. Another enabling factor is the nature of the job. There is a limit of work (especially the unskilled type) that an individual can handle within a specific period of time. If an employee does more than that regularly, there should be need for investigation. These and other enabling factors should be identified and addressed.
- Beyond the Employees: Substance abuse prevention should go beyond the employees to immediate family. The personal lives of employees profoundly affect on-the-job performance. A happy, balanced home life extends into the workplace, encouraging both enthusiasm and high quality work. On the other hand, personal concerns, particularly if they are severe and extended over time, can have just the opposite effect, rendering an employee tense, depressed, unfocused and often unable to fulfill job responsibilities. A child with a drug